“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself -- that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink.”
― 1984
Wednesday, June 26, 2019
Orwell Knows the Democrat Party
Saturday, June 1, 2019
Moving Leftier
Why would a Leftist professor suddenly come out with a hit-piece on Martin Luther King, Jr.?
Because judging someone based on the "content of their character" doesn't work very well for Leftists. When you have no moral principles beyond power-at-all-costs, it means that your character will be found to be non-existent.
Also, not judging someone by the "color of their skin" doesn't work at all with Leftist identity politics. How can you instill tribalism if people are judged as individuals? You can't, so the Left's entire plan to divide and conquer would fall apart.
And so, the powers that be on the Left have determined that a man who had been their greatest icon for the past 50 years must be destroyed. I guarantee you that the author of this piece, David Garrow, was called to a meeting with high level Leftist organizers and handed the info about MLK watching and laughing as a woman was raped in front of him. Garrow was then told to write the article. Being a good little Leftist, he has complied.
If they'll do that to MLK to advance their power, what do you suppose they'd do to you if you stood in their way?
Because judging someone based on the "content of their character" doesn't work very well for Leftists. When you have no moral principles beyond power-at-all-costs, it means that your character will be found to be non-existent.
Also, not judging someone by the "color of their skin" doesn't work at all with Leftist identity politics. How can you instill tribalism if people are judged as individuals? You can't, so the Left's entire plan to divide and conquer would fall apart.
And so, the powers that be on the Left have determined that a man who had been their greatest icon for the past 50 years must be destroyed. I guarantee you that the author of this piece, David Garrow, was called to a meeting with high level Leftist organizers and handed the info about MLK watching and laughing as a woman was raped in front of him. Garrow was then told to write the article. Being a good little Leftist, he has complied.
If they'll do that to MLK to advance their power, what do you suppose they'd do to you if you stood in their way?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)